Interferences | Law & Policy
Live: Tobacco Industry Interference on Amendment of Tobacco Control Law 2022
Tobacco industry is heavily interfering in the ongoing amendment process of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) (Amendment) Act, 2013, as initiated by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). As of August 2023, tobacco companies have exploited a number of business associations, third-party allies and mass media to propagate its arguments against proposals included in the draft amendment.
Context
The ongoing amendment process of the tobacco control law is rooted in the 2016 directive of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh for a simplification and overhaul of the tobacco control law of the country and her vision of building a tobacco-free country by 2040.
On 19 June 2022, the Health Services Division (HSD) of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) uploaded the preliminary draft of proposed amendments and asked for "specific opinion" sent to its e-mail address by 14 July 2022[1]. The draft proposals were prepared by a committee of 19, chaired by the Additional Secretary (World Health) of MoHFW and represented by senior government officials from the National Tobacco Control Cell, the Ministry of Law, Justice, and Parliamentary Affairs and also by members from a number of inter-governmental organizations, local and international anti-tobacco organizations.
The proposed amendments to the Act present scope for an extensive overhaul of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) Act, first adopted in 2005 and later amended in 2013. The major proposals included in the draft amendment are as follows:
| Article 2 |
|
| Article 4 |
|
| Article 5 |
|
| Article 6 |
|
| Article 7 |
|
| Article 10 |
|
Instances of Tobacco Industry Interferences on Amendment Issue
As of August 2023, a number of business associations, third-party allies and mass media are found to be spreading tobacco industry’s arguments against the proposals included in the draft amendments. Evidence of tobacco companies or front groups directly engaging with policymakers and government officials on the issue of amendment is still absent in public domain. However, possibility of such engagement cannot be ruled out considering previous incidents of interference of tobacco industry during the 2013 amendment of tobacco control law, subsequent formulation of Rules in 2015, and drafting National Tobacco Control Policy in 2019.
The instances of TI interference in the amendment process show signs of widely used tactics by tobacco industry all over the world to thwart formulation and implementation of anti-tobacco policies. Some tactics are mentioned below:
Strategy: Third Party Techniques
- Intellectual Property Association of Bangladesh (IPAB)
On 28 July 2022, IPAB organized an event titled "IPAB Dialogue on Policy Review and Its Impact (Tobacco and Linkage Sector)” at the Hotel Sheraton of the capital. IPAB's press briefing says, the government has earned BDT 40,000 crores as revenues from tobacco sector in the last financial year. Under this circumstance, it should be clarified whether the proposals brought by the Health Ministry are rational or implementable.
The event particularly criticized proposals which include elimination of DSAs, ban on CSR of tobacco companies, ban on sale of single sticks. The press briefing claims that the proposals would threaten the livelihoods of 6 to 7 million people directly or indirectly involved in tobacco industry, influx of local and foreign investment, increase number of counterfeit products, and cause harassment of the people at grassroot level during implementation. Speakers at the event demanded that authorities consult with representatives from the tobacco industry as stakeholders. The Director-General of IPAB also claimed that the proposed amendment prohibits the govt. to have its representatives at the board of tobacco companies. However, no such provision was found in the draft amendment uploaded by MoHFW on its website. It should be noted that Mr. Md. Azizur Rahman FCS, the Director-General of IPAB is also the Head of Public Affairs & Company Secretary of BATB, according to 2017 and 2021 Annual Reports of BATB[2]. Ms. Mubina Asaf who is holding the the position of Treasurer of IPAB is also the Head of Legal and External Affairs of BATB[3]. BATB itself is a Corporate Member of IPAB. As the executive committee of IPAB has representatives from four crucial ministries (Industries, Cultural Affairs, Trade and Home Affairs), it is of public interest to investigate whether this entity has become a conduit of tobacco industry's interference and influence in policy making[4].
- Proliferation of Dubious ‘Anti-tobacco’ Organizations
A number of organizations, claiming to be ‘anti-tobacco’ in nature, is becoming increasingly active on the issue of tobacco control law amendment. Among the participants of the IPAB event was the Chairman of Grassroot Peoples Awareness for Development (GPAD) which claims itself to be an anti-tobacco organization. GPAD Chair voiced his protest against the proposed ban on e-cigarettes. The participants of the event also included a representative from Alliance for Social Development (ASD) which also presents itself as an anti-tobacco organization.
- National Association of Small & Cottage Industries of Bangladesh (NASCIB)
NASCIB is a trade association formed in 1984 to "to highlight MSME (Micro, Small, Medium) and Cottage Industries issues and work for the development of the MSME sector of the country." NASCIB website claims that the organization is the apex body of apex trade organization of Micro, Small, Medium (MSME) and Cottage industrial entrepreneurs[5].
Following the publication of draft amendment on the website by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), different district chapters of NASCIB organized a series of press conferences throughout the country protesting the proposals included in the draft amendment[6]. As of 24 August 2022, such press conferences took place at least in the districts of Narsingdi, Rangpur, Bandarban, Munshiganj, Chuadanga, Kishoreganj, and Chattogram Metropolitan. Broadly, the concerns raised by NASCIB is mostly related to business interests of retailers and mobile sellers.
In press conferences held in Chattogram, Chuadanga and Kishoreganj, NASCIB chapters raised objections to seven specific proposals included in the draft amendment which are: A) mandating license for retailers, B) elimination of DSAs, C) ban on single stick sale, D) inclusion of tea stalls as public places, E) Ban on display of tobacco products at points-of-sale, G) Ban on mobile sale of tobacco products, and H) raising the financial penalties for violation[7]. NASCIB leaders of different districts claimed that adoption of the proposals would result in the loss of livelihoods of 1.5 million small businessmen and retailers and such measure would affect lives of 8 million low-income people. The organization also claimed that proposals in the amendment would flood the market in counterfeit products and cause loss of revenues for the government. The proposed provision to ban display of tobacco products at points-of-sale would result in uncertainty regarding the availability of tobacco products, the organization claimed.
- Use of Business Organizations
A number of national-level business associations and organizations have raised voice against different provisions of the proposed amendment of the tobacco control law, as per reports published in different media. According to a report published in the Daily Inqilab on 3 September 2022, Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce, and Industry (FBCCI), Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Dhaka (MCCI), Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry (DCCI), Foreign Investors' Chamber of Commerce & Industry (FICCI), Bangladesh Restaurant Owners' Association, and Bangladesh Printing Industry Association. While the newspaper did not mention any specific source in favor of such claim, it should be noted that a number of officials from BATB and JTI are holding positions in these business associations.
Validity of the Arguments Presented by IPAB and NASCIB
The ‘concerns’ raised by both IPAB and NASCIB are related to alleged economic repercussion of tobacco control law amendment as proposed by the MoHFW. Both local and multinational tobacco companies and their associations as well as front groups have long been claiming that any raise in tobacco taxes, introduction of specific taxes or surcharges, packaging or other tobacco control measure would result in loss of livelihoods, loss in government revenues, fall in foreign direct investment, and influx of counterfeit products. (See: Tobacco Industry Arguments Against Tobacco Taxation).
IPAB claimed that proposals of the draft amendment would threaten livelihoods of 6-7 million people. NASCIB has put the loss of livelihoods at 1.5 million and the number of people affected at 8 million. The numbers presented by these two bodies are not based on any scientific study or survey and possibly fabricated to strengthen their arguments against the draft amendments. Experiences with regard to bidi industry regulations and tobacco taxes show that the industry tend to highly magnify the size of workforce and people associated with it. For example, bidi industry at different times put the number of its workforce at 1.5 million, 2 million, and 2.5 million. However, in 2019, the National Board of Revenue (NBR) released a report titled ‘The Revenue and Employment Outcome of Biri Taxation in Bangladesh’ which refuted the claims made by pro bidi industry groups regarding the size of bidi industry workforce. As per the study, the total number of full-time equivalent workers, including those regular, irregular, and contractual, are only 46,916 worked in the 198 functional bidi factories on a regular basis.
IPAB claimed that the tobacco industry contributed BDT 30,000 crores as revenues in government exchequer. However, according to American Cancer Society, tobacco-induced deaths and diseases alone cost the economy of Bangladesh around BDT 305.6 billion ($3.61 billion) a year, which was equivalent to 1.4 percent of its national GDP in the year 2017-18[8]. The use of tobacco causes around 129,000 deaths in Bangladesh a year.[9] Tobacco has been ranked as the fourth major contributing factors behind premature deaths in the country.[10]
Both NASCIB and IPAB criticized proposals to ban single stick cigarettes at retail points. According to a 2021 WHO report, tobacco products in Bangladesh in the third cheapest in Southeast Asian region, only after Myanmar and Nepal. Sale of single sticks makes tobacco products even cheaper and affordable. It weakens tax measures imposed on tobacco products to reduce its affordability and also renders graphic health warnings virtually ineffective. The availability of single sticks or loose tobacco products creates ample opportunity to initiate tobacco use among the youths and reduces the urgency to quit. A total of 118 countries, including Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Maldives, Vietnam, and Pakistan have already banned sale of single sticks[11].
These two organizations have also raised objections against the proposal to introduce mandatory license to sell tobacco products. A number of countries have already introduced mandatory license to sell cigarettes and other tobacco products, which include India, US, UK, UAE, Turkey, China, Canada, Australia, Argentina. Finland, Hungary, France, Italy, and Spain[12]. Besides, under the existing Tobacco Control Implementation Guidelines for Local Government Institutes of Bangladesh, licenses are required for the retail sale of tobacco products[13].
The proposals also include a ban on display of tobacco products at points of sale. Display of tobacco products decorated in a certain manner is proven to encourage people to initiate smoking or buy these products impulsively, studies conducted in New Zealand[14] and Australia[15] have found. According to a survey conducted among retail stores around schools of Dhaka, 75 percent of retailers display tobacco products and 30 percent of these retailers display these products directly at the eye level of the children[16]. Another such study conducted in different areas near schools and playgrounds show that 64.19 percent of points-of-sale put tobacco products beside candy, chocolate and toys[17].
While there is no record of NASCIB interfering in tobacco control measures, IPAB has established itself as a third-party ally of a particular multinational tobacco company in Bangladesh due to its pro-tobacco stance and presence of tobacco company personnel in its leadership. (See: Tobacco Companies Exploiting Trade Bodies in Bangladesh).
Strategy: Use of Front Groups
- Webinar by Voice of Vapers
On 2 September 2022, Voice of Vapers (VoV) organized a webinar titled "Save Vaping, Save Bangladesh”. Speakers at the webinar claimed that a ban on vaping in Bangladesh would cause the number of smokers to rise. Notably, VoV is working as an official partner of World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA) which is reportedly being covertly funded by British American Tobacco (BAT). VoV is an initiative of different vape traders of Bangladesh and is operated by Bangladesh Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Traders Association (BENDSTA).
- Bangladesh Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Traders Association
The first recorded instance (as available in public domain) of tobacco industry interference in the amendment process came from Bangladesh Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Traders Association (BENDSTA), an association of major ENDS importers formed in 2020 with a view to promoting vaping as ‘safe alternative’ to traditional tobacco products and facilitating pro-vape regulations. On 4 July 2022, BENDSTA organized a press conference to voice its response to the draft amendment. BENDSTA particularly opposed the proposal as included in the draft amendment that bans production, import, export, market and sale of emerging tobacco products (ETPs) and presents list of demands[18].
BENDSTA, in its press brief, claimed that developing countries, such as the US, the UK and Canada, are increasingly choosing vaping as a smoking cessation tool. It also claimed that vaping is 95 percent less harmful than traditional cigarettes and secondhand smoke from vaping is completely safe. BENDSTA cited US-based Consumer Choice Centre (CCC) which estimated that introducing vaping may result in 6.2 million current smokers quitting and switching to vaping. BENDSTA referred to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and claimed that the country approved open-market sale of vape products considering its health benefits. The association referred to the involvement of non-government organizations in the drafting of the proposed amendments and also commented, “The Health Ministry is catering to everything these NGOs want.”
Apart from questioning the proposals included in the draft amendment, BENDSTA also raised demands:
- that vaping and ENDS products be removed from the scope of tobacco control law.
- that vaping products be considered as 'quitting tools' and brought under a separate policy or act.
- that the authorities consult with BENDSTA members before formulating any regulation related to such products.
- Research, Summit and Roundtables Supported by PMI-funded FSFW
Voice of Vapers (VoV) Bangladesh and Asian Harm Reduction Alliance (AHRA) organized a summit and a roundtable on 27 May 2023 which urged policymakers to eliminate the proposed ban on e-cigarettes from the draft amendment. The events were supported by Foundation for Smoke-free World (FSFW), a PMI-funded front group. Representatives from several key govt. bodies also participated in these events.
Following these events, on 31 May 2023, popular daily the Dhaka Tribune published a full-page supplement that include two opinion pieces: one from Dr. Derek Yach, the president of FSFW titled ‘THR: ‘No other public health intervention comes close to achieving such significant impact’ and one from Dr. Marewa Glover, titled ‘Banning and prohibition never work’ Dr. Glover is a known harm reduction lobbyist and runs an organization The Centre for Research Excellence: Indigenous Sovereignty and Smoking (COREISS) which is heavily funded by FSFW. Dhaka Tribune’s supplement also had a section titled “In their own words: Top Organizations Stance on THR”. This section has quotes from WHO Campaign for Tobacco-free Kids (CTFK), British Medical Association, American Heart Association and others claiming that these organizations support harm reduction of tobacco.
Validity of Claims Presented by Front Groups
 |
With the exception of a few organizations from UK and New Zealand as mentioned in the Dhaka Tribune supplement, the majority of the organizations mentioned have emphasized concerns regarding the risk of dual use, youth initiation / use, the unknown harms of e-cigarettes, and/ or the marketing tactics of the tobacco industry. Hence, the statement on e-cigarettes, in reality, cherry- picked and published by the THR proponents, have actually been taken out of context. For example, WHO in its Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2021[19], cautioned against such products, saying, “Some of the nicotine and tobacco products fast emerging in different markets – including ENDS, heated tobacco products (HTPs) and nicotine pouches – pose serious health concerns.” In 2017, WHO also released a statement where it said, "...research and advocacy funded by tobacco companies and their front groups cannot be accepted at face value. When it comes to the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World, there are a number of clear conflicts of interest involved with a tobacco company funding a purported health foundation, particularly if it promotes sale of tobacco and other products found in that company’s brand portfolio. WHO will not partner with the Foundation. Governments should not partner with the Foundation and the public health community should follow this lead." |
Some examples of these organizations’ stance on e-cigarettes can be found below:
|
Organization |
Stance on Emerging Tobacco Products |
Stance portrayed in Dhaka Tribune Supplement |
|
Cochrane Systematic Evidence Review |
Cautioned against and called for stricter regulation. (Source) “Lack of quality control measures, possible harms of second‐hand EC vapor inhalation, concerns that the products may be a gateway to smoking initiation or nicotine dependence among nicotine‐naïve users or may prolong continued dual use of tobacco among cigarette smokers, concerns that ECs may undermine smoke‐free legislation if used in smoke‐free spaces, concerns about the involvement of the tobacco industry, and concerns that the long‐term effects of EC use on health are not yet known are often cited.” |
"61 scientific studies (including 34 randomized control trials) involving 16,759 participants in a dozen countries. FINDINGS: "Moderate certainty evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes are more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapies [nicotine patches and nicotine gum]. We did not detect evidence of harm from nicotine e-cigarettes." |
|
Campaign for Tobacco-free Kids (CTFK) |
Cautioned that initiation of e-cigarettes among youths may lead to dual use.(Source) “The number of youths using e-cigarettes raises serious concerns that e-cigarettes may function as a gateway to the use of more dangerous, combustible tobacco products. The Surgeon General found that while more research is needed, e-cigarette use is “strongly associated” with the use of other tobacco products among youth and young adults, including conventional cigarettes.” “The U.S. Surgeon General concluded in 2012 that the tobacco industry’s price-reducing promotions are one of the factors that has led to higher tobacco use among youth.” |
“E-cigarettes could benefit public health if they help significantly reduce the number of people who use combustible cigarettes and die of tobacco-related disease.” |
|
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
Based on scientific evidence, CDC cautioned that initiation of e-cigarettes among youths may lead to dual use. (Source) “A recent CDC study found that many adults are using e-cigarettes in an attempt to quit smoking. However, most adult e-cigarette users do not stop smoking cigarettes and are instead continuing to use both products (known as “dual use”) Because smoking even a few cigarettes a day can be dangerous, quitting smoking completely is very important to protect your health.” |
“E-cigarettes expose users to fewer harmful chemicals than burned cigarettes” “E-cigarettes have the potential to benefit adult smokers who are not pregnant if used as a complete substitute for regular cigarettes and other smoked tobacco products” |
|
US Food and Drug Administration |
Cautioned against harmful effect of nicotine exposure through e-cigarettes on the brain development of adolescents. (Source) Many teens don’t understand how easy it is to become addicted to tobacco products. The younger a person is when they start using tobacco, the more likely they are to become addicted. Nicotine exposure during adolescence can disrupt normal brain development. Because of nicotine’s powerfully addictive nature and major effects on the developing brain, no tobacco products are safe for youth to use. |
E-cigarettes are “potentially less harmful forms of nicotine delivery for adults. ...Many studies suggest e-cigarettes and noncombustible tobacco products may be less harmful than combustible cigarettes” “Make no mistake. We see the possibility for ENDS products like e-cigarettes to provide a potentially less harmful alternative for currently addicted individual adult smokers who still want to get access to satisfying levels of nicotine without many of the harmful effects that come with the combustion of tobacco.” |
An issue brief titled “New Voices Championing New Tobacco Products” published by STOP also reported that PMI-funded FSFW is using its grantees and allies to make policy recommendations for “risk-proportionate regulation,” to influence public policy toward favorable treatment of these new products, including fewer restrictions such as lower taxes on products marketed as “reduced-risk.”
Although VoV claimed that banning e-cigarettes would cause a spike in smoking, there is no scientific evidence in support of such a claim. While BENDSTA claimed that a number of developed and developing countries (UK, USA, New Zealand, Canada, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Philippines as mentioned in the press briefing) are benefitting from considering vaping as cessation tools, it presents a distorted picture of the reality. More and more youths in these countries are getting hooked to vaping, posing a serious threat to public health. Globally, the vape market is seemingly more prone to spread among children and teenagers than among existing adult smokers.
A 2021 study[20] by American Cancer Society, (also cited in the Dhaka Tribune supplement) conducted among US adults between 2014 and 2018, says, "The largest absolute population increase in e-cigarette users between 2014 and 2018 was among younger-adult never smokers (0.49-1.35 million followed by near-term quitters among middle-aged (0.36-0.95 million), younger (0.23-0.57 million), and older (0.35-0.50 million) adults." One may consider the latter two increases almost negligible when compared to the increase among never-smokers. The study also concludes, “The continuous increase among younger-adult never smokers suggests a rise in primary nicotine initiation with e-cigarettes.” This means such products are creating newer and younger groups of nicotine-addicted population rather than helping people quit traditional tobacco products.
The situation is even worse considering prevalence of the use of emerging tobacco products among demographic below age 18. According to Pew Research Centre[21], in the US between 2017 and 2019, the shares of vapers among 12th graders jumped from 11 percent to 25 percent; among 10th graders, the numbers jumped from 8 percent to 20 percent and among 8th graders, from 4 percent to 9 percent.
Canadian Paediatric Society, in a 2021 statementp[22], mentioned, “In 2019, 36% of adolescents aged 15 to 19 reported having tried vaping at some point, with 15% having vaped in the previous 30 days. This is nearly five times more than among adults aged 25 and older.”
The scenario also applies for New Zealand where a government survey[23] reported a three-fold increase among youths aged 15 to 17 between 2018-19 and 2020-2021. The survey shows that vaping is more spreading among never-smokers than among smokers, as intended. The New Zealand Herald commented on the findings, "If only smokers took up vaping, we would expect to see increases in vaping to be offset by equivalent decreases in smoking. Instead, the growth in daily vaping exceeds the decline in daily smoking."[24]
Another study finds that adolescents (12-15 y/o) whose first tobacco products are e-cigarettes, are four times more likely to initiate cigarette use in next two years, compared to non-users[25].
Considering the grave threat e-cigarettes and vaping pose to public health, a total of 32 countries have already banned ENDS[26]. According to Global Center for Good Governance in Tobacco Control (GGTC), 36 countries strictly regulate nicotine and other contents in e-cigarettes and 73 countries allow selling e-cigarettes but under considerable sales restrictions[27].
BENDSTAs claim that secondhand vaping is harmless is also refuted by mounting scientific evidences[28] which report wheezing, bronchitic symptoms and shortness of breath caused by exposure to secondhand nicotine vape.
BENDSTA’s claims of vaping and ENDS products to be 95 percent less harmful also gravely contradicts with scientific findings and consensus among scientific community. WHO in its Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2021[29], says, “Some of the nicotine and tobacco products fast emerging in different markets – including ENDS, heated tobacco products (HTPs) and nicotine pouches – pose serious health concerns.” As opposed to the claims made by vape traders’ body, the report also expresses concern that the use of such products may prevent people from quitting or lead to the use of traditional tobacco products, “the act of using ENNDS mimics the use of conventional cigarettes, which is a behavioral pattern that can prevent those trying to quit tobacco from doing so successfully – and it may even contribute to non-smokers (particularly children and adolescents) taking up the use of conventional cigarettes.”
Similar concern is also raised by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which reports that two-thirds of JUUL (a brand of e-cigarettes) users aged 15 – 24 do not know that JUUL always contains nicotine. Nicotine disrupts the natural growth of adolescent brain[30].
BENDSTA claimed, “Very recently the US FDA has approved open market sale of vaping considering its benefits.” This claim is far from truth. On the issue of E-Cigarettes, Vapes, and other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), the FDA's official website[31] says, “To date, no e-cigarette has been approved as a cessation device or authorized to make a modified risk claim”. In 2017, the FDA launched its 'The Real Cost" campaign that prioritizes e-cigarette prevention among the youth[32].
Citing Consumer Choice Centre (CCC), BENDSTA claimed that introducing vaping may lead to 6.2 million current smokers quitting and switching to vaping and ENDS products. It should be noted that, CCC is a US-based lobby group that has received funding from all major tobacco companies (which are now also in ENDS businesses), i.e., Japan Tobacco International (JTI), Philip Morris International (PMI), British American Tobacco (BAT), and Altria[33]. According to Tobacco Tactics, these companies do not disclose the nature of their involvement with CCC.
It should be noted that BENDSTA runs another platform namely Voice of Vapers Bangladesh (VoV Bangladesh) which is in official partnership with World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA). An investigation by the Daily Beast found that, “British American Tobacco has played a central and hands-on role in orchestrating, directing, and funding the World Vapers’ Alliance”.[34] Such revelation puts BENDSTA’s anti-tobacco rhetoric into question.
BENDSTA demanded that e-cigarettes and vaping products not be identified as tobacco products and removed from the scope of tobacco control law. However, Bangladesh is, in fact, in line with the World Health Organization (WHO), in its approach to consider ENDS items as tobacco products. It should also be noted that, Bangladesh has signed and ratified the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), a global public health treaty. The Article 5.3 of FCTC says, “In setting and implementing their public health policies with respect to tobacco control, Parties shall act to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry in accordance with national law.” This renders BENDSTA or any such group ineligible to be involved in formulating vape-related or other such policies.
Strategy: Use of So-called International Experts
On 1 July 2022, a group of 17 so-called public health experts sent letters to the MoHFW which refereed to e-cigarettes as ‘safe alternatives’ and urged the government to withdraw its proposed ban on the electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and to regulate ENDS instead of banning it. Signees belong to different TI front groups such as CoHEAR, GTNF, AHRA etc. A significant number of signees of these letters are associated with the Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR) of the University of Catania, Italy. The ‘experts’ as well as these organizations have multi-faceted links with PMI-funded FSFW.
Strategy: Sending Letters to Govt. Bodies
- BATB’s Letter to National Board of Revenue (NBR)
On 25 August 2022, BATB sent a letter addressed to the Large Taxpayer Unity (LTU) where the company deplored the initiative of tobacco control law amendment as 'impractical and unimplementable' and sought interference from NBR in this matter. BATB referred to some specific subsections of the proposed amendment, such as, elimination of Designated Smoking Areas (DSAs), banning so-called corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs of tobacco companies, banning the sale of loose sticks and also banning e-cigarettes and other vaping products, and claimed that such provisions would threaten the whole tobacco industry. The letter also claimed that the proposed amendment, if passed and enacted accordingly, may lead to a surge in counterfeit cigarettes in the market, and cause a loss of BDT 30,000 crore in government revenue.
- Validity of Claims Made by BATB
A 2019 study conducted by the American Cancer Society put the financial burden of tobacco use in FY 2017-18 at BDT 305.6 billion, much higher than the potential revenue loss claimed by BATB. Tobacco is the 4th contributing factor to deaths and disabilities in Bangladesh. Tobacco use claims 161,000 lives a year and in addition incapacitates hundreds of thousands of people.
Strategy: Using Non-Health Ministries/Govt. Bodies to Pressurize Health Ministry
In a letter addressed to the Secretary, Health Services Division, NBR expressed concern over the implementation aspect of the proposed amendment of the tobacco control law. In its letter, NBR claimed that the socio-economic context of Bangladesh will make it difficult to implement some of the proposed provisions included in the draft amendment related to the production, sale and use of tobacco products. NBR also claimed that implementing MoHFW’s proposed amendment may cause a spike in the influx of counterfeit tobacco products. It should be noted that BATB previously sent a letter to NBR expressing similar concerns and urging the latter to intervene on its behalf.
- Validity of the Claims
According to a World Bank report titled Confronting Illicit Tobacco Trade: A Global review of Country Experiences, published in February 2019, the percentage of illicit trade of tobacco in Bangladesh stands at merely 1.8 percent, the lowest in 27 countries. The report also states that illicit tobacco trade constitutes 17 percent of tobacco trade in our neighboring country India, 38 percent in Pakistan, 36 percent in Malaysia and the highest 50 percent in Latvia. The report also says that the illicit tobacco trade stands at US$ 4 million a year in Bangladesh, less than 4 percent of total tobacco revenue.
A 2021 WHO report also refutes NBR’s claim as it reveals that Bangladesh ranks 107th among 167 countries where cigarettes are sold at the cheapest price. In Southeast Asia, Bangladesh sells the 2nd cheapest cigarette brands, after Myanmar. As a result, the influx of illicit cigarettes from neighboring countries is a very unlikely scenario.
Strategy: Concerted Media Campaign
Following the publication of the draft amendment on the website by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), a number of questionable coverages of the amendment surfaced on the internet and mass media of Bangladesh. Some media outlets were also found to be widely circulating arguments presented by tobacco industry and its third-party allies. For example, an article published in the Daily Bangladesh Pratidin on 28 July 2022 quoted unnamed ‘anti-smoking protestors’ and wrote, “In the absence of opportunity to smoke at designated smoking areas (DSAs) or in tea stalls, coffee houses, people may start smoking at home. This will increase the health risk faced by the women and children.”[35] The following lines in the report borrows lines directly from the press briefings disseminated by NASCIB.
A news clip from Independent Television[36] cited 'analysts' and expressed concern that such an amendment may spike the use of bidi, and negatively impact government's revenue earning and public health. It interviewed Executive Director of PRI (a well-known BATB associate), Head of External Affairs of BAT and Spokesperson of Bangladesh Cigarette Manufacturers Association (BCMA).
Events organized by pro-tobacco think tanks also received widespread media coverage. A number of public relations agencies, currently in agreement with a multinational tobacco company, might have contributed to this widespread coverage. It should also be noted that, some widely-circulated dailies, including the Daily Star and Samakal are in partnership with Prerona Foundation, a front organization of British American Tobacco Bangladesh (BATB).
Even during the preparation of draft amendment, some media outlets have taken questionable stance on the issue. For example: one such article “NGOs in Control of Tobacco Law Amendment” was published in the Daily Jugantor on 11 November 2021[37]. The article says, "The control of NGOs over tobacco control law amendment is increasing. Some NGOs have appeared on the driver seats in the process of drafting state policies. Relevant stakeholders are getting less priority." The report refers to allegation from unnamed stakeholders a number of times but did not disclose any identity of such stakeholders. Although it mentions that Article 5.3 of FCTC prevents countries from engaging with any group with vested commercial interests while preparing public health policies, it raises demands that the Health Ministry consult with Bangladesh Cigarette Manufacturers Association (BCMA), Bidi Federation and different chambers of commerce as stakeholders before formulating such policies. A similar report surfaced in the Daily Naya Diganta on 20 August 2022 which also reiterated the allegation that ‘relevant stakeholders’ had not been left out of the amendment procedure. However, BATB's Head of External Affairs was quoted in the report saying, "We have given our opinion with regard to the amendment of smoking and tobacco products usage (control) act. Cigarette Manufacturers Association of Bangladesh, Japan Tobacco, and Bangladesh Shop Owners Association have also given their opinion. We want the authorities sit with us before formulating such laws. This is being bypassed."[38]
Strategy: Using ‘loyalist’ economists and fake persona to publish articles and columns
In addition to dubious news reporting on mass media, there has been a proliferation of opinion pieces on the issue of tobacco control law amendment that reiterates the arguments raised by tobacco industry. The columnists often have vested interest in particular tobacco companies. In some cases, the pro-tobacco articles are published with names and vague identity. For example, on 17 October 2022, an article titled "Proposed Tobacco Control Act amendment ignores tax earnings, livelihoods" was published in the Daily Financial Express under the name Rashid Chowdhury. The article introduces the writer only as "an economic analyst" and provides no academic or professional affiliation or other specific information. A translation of the article was published on 2 November 2022 in the Daily Ittefaq which also does not divulge any information about the author's identity. It should be noted that publishing articles under vague identity is a tactic widely used in disinformation campaigns.
References
[1] Draft amendment of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) Act 2005 uploaded on website by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) seeking public opinion; June 19, 2022 https://hsd.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/hsd.portal.gov.bd/notices/943f8c5b_9b64_4f09_9efb_34eb40327e13/WH-2-196-New.pdf
[2] Mr. Md. Azizur Rahman FCS, Head of Public Affairs & Company Secretary British American Tobacco Bangladesh, https://web.archive.org/web/20220823211903/https://www.batbangladesh.com/group/sites/BAT_9T5FQ2.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DOA9EDQ8?opendocument
[3] Female leaders paving way for future generation: Mubina Asaf; https://web.archive.org/web/20220823212142/https://bangladeshpost.net/posts/female-leaders-paving-way-for-future-generation-mubina-asaf-59702
[5] About NASCIB; https://web.archive.org/web/20220204064825/https://nascib.org.bd/?about=about-nascib
[6] Concern expressed over proposed amendment to Tobacco Control Act, https://web.archive.org/web/20220823192148/https://www.dailytribunal24.com/country/district/23523
[7] Small traders face financial loss due to license problems: NASCIB,
[8] The Economic Cost of Tobacco Use in Bangladesh: A Health Cost Approach; https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/economic-and-healthy-policy/bangladesh-health-cost-full-report-2020.pdf
[9] Bangladesh, Tobacco Atlas by American Cancer Society https://web.archive.org/web/20220303133232/https://tobaccoatlas.org/country/bangladesh/
[10] Bangladesh, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. https://web.archive.org/web/20220320191238/http://www.healthdata.org/bangladesh
[11] C329: Sale of cigarettes individually or in small packets prohibited, FCTC Article 16 Reports, https://untobaccocontrol.org/impldb/article-16/
[12] Toba
